This tournament very well could be for that "ladder" you guys mentioned.

Good thinking, guys. Keep these ideas coming.

go0od thinking ME. I thought of it.
Gimme credit .

J/p.

When Does the tournament start

yeah the ladder idea is good sounds pretty fair..but didnt cee get that
belt off a topical battle?...anyways tagteam sounds nice and all but if you do tags you gotta have a different belt fo the tag champs...
battle and topicals are kinda similar..but your lookin for different
things in a topical as opposed to a text battle.. so I think
at least id say 4 belts text , topical, audio , and tag..
champ has to defend 1 per month minimal...
some people are better at topical and some people are better at
dissing...unless your tryin to cater to one certain type of writer
having seperate belts is the only fair way..(haha esp since it'll be months before i'm good enough to challenge a title holder anyway)..lmao

whatever it is I'm in..

oath, sounds good.

Ay
Someone Tell Me Why Cee4 Aint Mention Scott James???

And He's Been Askin For The Most Battles Out Cee4!!!....


Can Anyone Adlib ... PUSSY....

nah i got it off winning a tournament of which only the second round was a topical. the rest of the tourny was regular battles

glad to see im still on your mind since your analyzing everything i say.
well if you "analyzed" a little closer you`d see i did mention Scott James lol
so your creating lies to try and make me look bad now are you?
see thats why i dont like u. u lie and lie and lie about everything. switchin from a baby gangsta routine to mr know it all giving everyone on illest "encouragment" and shit like ur trying to help lol
ur all on peoples nuts and then its beef and then back on the nuts again lol
fuck outta here

im not scared of anybody lol
ive pretty much battled anyone whos anyone on here


i already said as soon as i finished with Sintakz that im done battling for a while. yeah i was tempted into battling you just so i could put u in a casket since i dont like you and all the bullshit u stand for. now ima forget all about u from a competition point of view.


and yeah since im gonna give up the belt i know for a fact that i`ll get a shot at it when i decide to return and that will more than likely be against Scott James since he will wipe the floor with most of the people thats thrown their name in the hat.




on another note all these different belts seem kinda gay to me. if theres gonna be belts i think it would be better having a strictly text battle belt and an audio battle belt and maybe a topical/written belt but im not even sure about that. too many belts would make them worthless. not that their worth that much. peopele already know whos the best anyway regardless of belts n shit.



*END OF ESSAY lol

There isn't going to be a tag belt if it's up to me in any way, shape, or form.

This isn't the WWE.

ur a homo. tag belts encourage teamwork and collabs, its always been intense watching tag battles from the past and they've left historical marks (ex scip and arv vs rell and jay; plex and ekoms as evil geniuses taking over in 06)


there goes my 2 cents in ya piggy bank lol

word.. another site i been on had tag belts..

and it worked... was always fun to have 2 v 2....and the belt just adds extra spice... it will definately make for some hot battles... no question..

the belts they had where pretty standard..

text champ, audio champ, topical champ and tag team champs..

for solid categories imo..

you have some sites where its like "multi belt", "metaphor belt", "best flow title"... which is definately too far lol... but the 4 mentioned previously all have a place..

another idea could be a "horrorcore title", however this idea was shot down on the other site, as people thought it would be a slippery slope, down to the multi, flow titles etc..

i'll explain my original idea more..

you have 16 entrants.... split into 4 divisions of 4...

say

1,2,3,4....5,6,7,8.....9,10,11,12....13,14,15,16...

battles commence, where each battler battles the others in there division once, so

1 v 2, 1 v 3, 1 v 4, 2 v 3, 2 v 4, 3 v 4

5 v 6, 5 v 7, 5 v 8, 6 v 7, 6 v 8, 7 v 8

9 v 10, 9 v 11, 9 v 12, 10 v 11, 10 v 12, 11 v 12

13 v 14, 13 v 15, 13 v 16, 14 v 15, 14 v 16, 15 v 16

equatin' = 24 battles all together..

top two in each group go threw.. any ties, will be sorted by number of votes for/against..

battle win = 3 point(K.O. = 4 points), Gettin' a vote and losing = 1 point, losing via a K.O = 0 points , no show = - 1 point.

(or something similar)..

then the top two from each, say 1 and 4, 6,7, 10, 12, 13, 16

all get randomly drawn again... (debatable whether you go into regular format now, or have another league.. standard format is obvious, so i'll leave it un explained.. the other way would go.... )

randomly generated..

it could be... 1, 7, 12, 16 in one group... and 4,6, 10, 13 in the other..

the format goes the same as the one above.. only this time cause there are half the entrants, there will only be 12 battles taken place, allowing for a final 4...

this final four can then either.. enter a final league.. and the winner being crowned.. or they can go via the more popular option of going into a regualar tournament format..

so the final four.. say 7, 12, 6, 10..

would battle i.e. 7 v 10, 12 v 6..

then the final.. say.. 7 v 10...

and then the winner would come from that battle..

it seems more fair to do a league than a standard battle league, as you dont go out on one bad battle, however, some people prefer the pressure and the efficicency of a regular format tourney..

so i could put u in a casket


^ Lmao Your Such a Chump Kid.

It's 3-3 Don't Feel So Full Of ya Self,

ok well looks like we know who to set up the tourney (mark)

it looks pretty organized to me.

I am in this shit now all you kids keep quiet and quit arguing like bitches.
Someone set up this shit i am down.