Page 1 of 1

check this battle again

Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:26 am
by Arvincible
ekoms-vs-arvincible-ekoms-tko-5-4-vt7801.html


the voting wasnt done properly and i think i should have a chance to give it a second look.

The votes were retarded and If we can have a revoting or something yall can look at it better.

just vote to three and shit...i dont think i deserve this loss at all, so im just requesting the loss takin off. Ekoms can have a win but i dont want that shit on my record.

Posted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 11:18 pm
by complexity
I'll handle this tomorrow.

Me and one other veteran will evaluate this battle. And discuss it.

We will be back with a decision.

Sorry, we don't get to these battles quickly. But there is no reason to.

As long as it gets done.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 4:28 am
by Omega Bill
Ya know, going back and reading this...

Default cats were punches Personal and flow

Sequence voted Arv:
Personals - Ekoms, liked the hazard line
punches - Arvincible
multis/flow - Arvincible

So it's 1-0

Raiza voted Arv:
Personals:Ekoms
Punches:Arv
Flow/Multies: Arv

So it's 2-0

TGYH voted Ekoms:
Punches-Arvincible...He Came A Bit Harder With His Punches...
Personals-EkomS...Had Quite A Few More Personals And Tha Quality Of His Personals Were Better...
Flow-EkomS...AR's Bars Are Too Stretched Out To Flow Tha Greatest..Showing Off Multiple Multies Doesnt Really Make Ya Amazin Either... Lol

So its 2-1.

Haz voted Ekoms:
Personals : Ekoms ( hands down)
Punches: both?. Ar had one decent Punch
Flow/Multies: Ar, Didnt seem like koms used his Usual style

So it's 2-2.

Cee4 voted Arv:
Personals :Ekoms hands down
Punches: Ekoms. in my opinion personals are punches.
Flow: Arvincible.(first time i can say Ekoms has lost a flow vote)

^^ That vote would go to Ekoms because voting wasnt done properly. But let's say it doesn't, cause theres another loop hole coming up that Ekoms casted away in the middle of the battle.

3-2 Arvs leading

Ekoms say:2-2 get the votes in people

It was 3-2. Not 2-2. He can't count so everyone though that itd be 1 vote back from it originally was.

Ghost votes for Arv:
punches- ar
personals- ekoms
flow- ar

Now, it's 4-2:

Double FL voted for Arv:
Punches: Ekoms
Personals: Close, but Arvincible takes it.
Flow: Arvincible

Now its 5-2

DONE GAME OVER NIGHT NIGHT ARVINCIBLE WON 5-2 ON THE 3RD FUCKING PAGE BEFORE ANY DRAMA EVEN HAPPENED!

I just did all the work for you guys. People can't fucking count. But lets say that Cee4s votes didnt count because it wasnt done properly. 4th page Swagger votes for Arv, Ekoms doesnt let it pass because he didn't vote correctly.

NO ONE voted correctly, technically, so ANY way you look at it Arv won this battle. Even after Ekoms got Kurse involved and had everything over-turned.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:32 am
by complexity
"NO ONE voted correctly, technically, so ANY way you look at it Arv won this battle. Even after Ekoms got Kurse involved and had everything over-turned."

But if you want to get that technical, you could discard like 100 battles, and we surely aren't going to do that.

People aren't going to go around and take Bush like wins on some technicality. Fuck that.

Me and the other vet will vote on the categories though.

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:42 am
by Omega Bill
There was no technicality, Arv won 5-2 in the 3rd page...I broke it down right there...

Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:39 am
by Arvincible
yeah thanks for looking into it guys, i just feel like i got played how kurse came in out of nowhere to save his buddy from getting another loss... the match was hell for mediocre verses, but its pretty important because it shows how fair illest is.

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:42 pm
by Arvincible
..how is this going so far plex?

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:18 pm
by Kurse
Damn...i don't even remember voting in that battle. haha

Memory is slippin hardddddd :(

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:07 am
by Omega Bill
This needs to get finished. It's been 2 months now. I laid it all out for whoever was reviewing and showed that Arvincible won this match in more ways than one.

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:17 am
by Subsist
Wild bill. ITs called Re-evaluate battle thread not re-count battle thread.

Posted: Sun May 11, 2008 1:49 pm
by Arvincible
shit caN WE get this fixed and over with?

Posted: Mon May 12, 2008 5:12 pm
by complexity
A pretty obvious one.

Me and another administrator have reversed the decision in Arvincible's favor.