Deleted 50 Inactive Members

[complexity]

Anyone who hasn't even logged in since march, and has no postsaasaa

[16 Micz]

NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo bad idea man.

[Ambiguous Realm]

no its not its pointless as fuck to have nonposters.. people who see the damn site might be like "oh they have alot of people "... they'll notice its dead as fuck eventually.. and become a nonposter themselves.. so either way we'd get a shitload of nonposters n e ways.. wat we need is active people..

[precise]

for sure

[16 Micz]

no its not its pointless as fuck to have nonposters.. people who see the damn site might be like "oh they have alot of people "... they'll notice its dead as fuck eventually.. and become a nonposter themselves.. so either way we'd get a shitload of nonposters n e ways.. wat we need is active people..

why are you crying, if there is alot of members, people will join yes, if they see its dead they may stop posting as well yes, but how about you keep it active and they wont have to see it dead, and if we get, lets say 12 members a week and they post 10-20 posts that week we're making progress, right about now we're not getting too many members so why delete some it is pointless...maybe if we were a big forum and had 1000s of people then we can delete members, but right about now we need to be working on getting members, and having a few members isnt appealing at all which made that move pointless...

[Ambiguous Realm]

lol making progress....i fail to see much progress...nobody who really joins even posts 10 times a week..or even a month... dedicated users should be the only ones allowed to join... and if they're just gonna sign up and post once.. they shouldn't register in the first place...